Quantcast
Channel: Rational numbers are impossible!
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 38

Rational numbers are impossible!

$
0
0

Chris wrote:

Hi Mike, I hope you don't feel piled up on.

The irrational numbers just sit between the rational numbers. You can give them any useful name, and you can estimate their location on a number line in relationship to another number. After all, we know that "pi" sits between "3" and "4" on an integer line, and is between "3.125" and "3.25" on a rational number line.

Because you can't express irrational numbers algebraically, you have to arrange them in relationship to real numbers and other irrational numbers, but they're still countable/estimate-able.

I agree with chenille that metaphor of the dart is about chance - not physicality. Vi is trying to express how odds/probability are effected by the multiple types of infinities contained on a single number line. Here's a simplified example:

In this integer set, I'm counting by tens: -10,0,10

There are three items, and my chance of hitting my choice is 1/3. (33%)
My odds of hitting any of the three is 3/3. (100%)

In this integer set, I'll count by ones:
-10,-9,-8,-7,-6,-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10

There are 21 items and my odds have changed.
Now my odds of hitting any one I choose is 1/21. (5%)
My odds of hitting any of the original 3 is 3/21. (14%)
My odds of hitting any of the new numbers is 18/21. (86%)

So that's just from changing a short number line with easily counted numbers, and Vi is talking about how you fill the gaps with infinities.

Read full topic


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 38

Trending Articles